The Pentagon is reportedly developing a new attack plan against Iran, even as President Donald Trump publicly assures that the United States will not strike before the midterm congressional elections scheduled for 3 November. The New York Times, citing anonymous administration officials, reported that the planning continues despite the president's reassurances.
According to the report, three aircraft carriers will soon be deployed to the Middle East. The Pentagon is also said to be drafting plans to hit missile and drone depots in Iran, as well as other military and energy-sector targets inside the country.
Over recent months, the Pentagon and Trump's national security team have presented the president with five proposals for a large-scale military operation against Iran or the rebel Yemeni movement Ansar Allah, also known as the Houthis. According to the article, Trump rejected all of them.
At the same time, many officials in Trump's inner circle believe that a military operation against Iran would have no effect on Tehran's plans. Some are convinced that the policy of economic pressure on Iran will eventually yield results, but that more time is needed to force Tehran to make significant concessions.
On the morning of 8 October, Trump denied the Axios report and stated that the United States does not plan attacks against Iran until the midterm elections for the US Congress, scheduled for 3 November.
The reported planning underscores the continuing tension between the White House's public messaging and the military's contingency preparations. While Trump has sought to project restraint ahead of the elections, the Pentagon's efforts suggest that options for a broader conflict remain on the table.
The deployment of three carriers would represent a significant buildup of US naval power in the region. Such a move would likely be interpreted as a signal of readiness, even if no strike is imminent.
Iran has not yet responded to the reports. The situation remains fluid, with the administration balancing diplomatic and economic pressure against military planning.