Wireva

Budget sets aside £7m for study of Northern Games bid

Chancellor John Healey will fund a feasibility study into a Northern Games, a bid led by Andy Burnham that follows two failed Manchester attempts to host the Olympics.

This item was produced with AI assistance under the editorial responsibility of Haydamax OÜ.

John Healey will use his Budget on Wednesday to fund a full feasibility study into a Northern Games, a move that puts around £7 million of taxpayer money behind the idea of bringing a multi-sport event to the North of England. The Prime Minister has said an Olympics bid would be « something everyone can get behind », signalling that the project has the backing of Downing Street.

The proposal is closely associated with Andy Burnham, the Mayor of Greater Manchester, who has championed the concept of a northern sporting showpiece. Critics point out that Manchester has previously tried and failed to win the right to host the Olympic Games on two occasions, a record that is likely to shape the debate over whether public money should be committed at this stage.

The Budget allocation is intended to test whether a Northern Games is practical before any formal bid is made. A feasibility study would examine questions such as venues, costs, transport links and the wider economic case for hosting an event of this scale outside London. No final decision on hosting or on a full bid has been taken, and the study is designed to inform that choice.

The timing of the announcement sits within a wider political context in which the government is seeking to show that investment and national ambition can be extended beyond the capital. Supporters of the idea argue that a feasibility exercise is a modest and proportionate step, and that the North has a strong record of staging major sporting events that have drawn investment, visitors and attention to the region. Their case rests on the premise that a clear, costed assessment is needed before any judgement can be made on whether the project is worthwhile.

Opponents, by contrast, argue that the spending is premature given the pressure on public finances, and that the money could be directed to other priorities in health, housing or local services. They also point to the history of Manchester's unsuccessful Olympic campaigns as a reason for caution, suggesting that repeated bids have not yet produced the outcome that regional leaders hoped for. For these critics, the central question is not whether the North could host a major event, but whether the expense of a study is justified before the costs and benefits have been established.

The announcement also draws attention to Mr Burnham, whose public profile has been raised by a range of high-visibility appearances in recent days. Whether the Northern Games moves beyond the feasibility stage will depend on the findings of the study, on the willingness of central government to commit further funds, and on how regional authorities decide to proceed. Until those findings are published, the project remains an aspiration backed by a single, defined sum of public money.

Same event, other desks

Story file →