Wireva

Metal Gear Solid 2 at 25 Predicted the Misinformation Age of the 2020s

Released in 2001 and initially divisive, Hideo Kojima's Metal Gear Solid 2 is being reassessed as a prescient look at social media, misinformation, and AI-driven control of information.

Hideo Kojima's Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty, which launched on the PlayStation 2 on November 13, 2001, is being revisited on its 25th anniversary as a work that anticipated the information environment of the 2020s. In an opinion piece for IGN, writer Carlos Morales argues that the game's themes of social media, misinformation, deepfakes, and generative AI feel far more relevant today than they did at release.

The game was not an easy success at first. Its reception was divisive: critics praised it, and it went on to sell more than seven million copies, but many fans were angry when the protagonist turned out to be Raiden rather than the series' familiar hero, Solid Snake. Long cutscenes and philosophical dialogue delivered through the codec system also drew criticism from players who wanted more straightforward action.

Morales says the story's core concerns have aged into something close to prophecy. The narrative explores social engineering, digital censorship, cyberwarfare, and a post-truth society in which institutions and information are manipulated. Its central antagonists, the Patriots, are an AI-driven shadow group that controls society and the flow of information. For Morales, the idea of a hidden system shaping what people see and believe speaks directly to the way online platforms and synthetic media now operate.

The structure of the game reinforces those ideas. Its plot parallels the Shadow Moses incident from the first Metal Gear Solid, and its metatextual twists comment on how players are conditioned by the linear design of games. Later sections deliberately fake failure screens and reveal that an apparently human colonel is in fact controlled by AI. Morales reads these moments as a challenge to the player's assumptions about what is real within the game world, a theme that he links to the current era of doubt about digital content.

Morales also points to the ending, which favors individual choice over institutional control, as a notable part of the work's message. He argues that the game's relevance has only grown as the information environment of the 2020s has come to resemble the fears it depicted two decades earlier. Kojima, the series creator, has since gone on to make other works, including Death Stranding and Physint, but the 2001 title remains the reference point for the author's argument.

The piece is an opinion rather than a report on new developments, and its conclusions reflect the writer's reading of the game's themes. Its anniversary framing offers a reminder that a title once remembered mainly for its controversies is now being reconsidered for the questions it raised about technology, truth, and personal agency.

Same event, other desks

Story file →