Wireva

Charlie Kirk's Family Alleges UVU Knew of Rooftop Security Risk Before Assassination

The family of Charlie Kirk has filed a notice of claim against Utah Valley University, the State of Utah, and campus officials, alleging that known rooftop security vulnerabilities led to his wrongful death. The filing cites a prior warning about rooftop access to a building near the speaking venue and claims that a request for additional officers was denied.

This item was produced with AI assistance under the editorial responsibility of Haydamax OÜ.

The family of Charlie Kirk has filed a notice of claim — a precursor to a lawsuit — against Utah Valley University, the State of Utah, and key individuals involved in campus leadership and security decisions, alleging that their failures led to the Turning Point USA founder's wrongful death. The filing, signed by attorneys Loren Washburn, Brett Parkinson, and Clifford Parkinson and dated Sept. 9, argues that the risk of a rooftop shooter should have been especially top-of-mind given the attempted assassination of President Trump, Kirk's close friend and political ally, by a rooftop shooter the previous year.

According to the filing, Turning Point USA organizers told UVU Police Chief Jeffrey Long that students had informed them of rooftop access to the Sorenson Center, a building «pretty close» to where Kirk would be speaking and directly west of the Losee Center, from which the alleged killer fired. «If this is true, it would be nice to either have it controlled access or allow one of my guys to be there as well,» a TPUSA representative wrote to the chief, according to the filing. «If possible.» Long allegedly replied, «I got you covered.»

Kirk, a 31-year-old father of two, was shot and killed on Sept. 10, 2025, in the campus courtyard. Authorities say a lone gunman took a sniper's perch on the Losee Center rooftop on the far side of the clearing. Lawyers for the suspect, 23-year-old Tyler Robinson, pleaded not guilty on his behalf at an arraignment nearly a year later.

«His murder was entirely preventable and, in fact, would not have happened had the State of Utah and UVU followed through on their stated security promises, which included protecting the rooftops surrounding the quad where Charlie was speaking,» said Brett Parkinson, counsel for the Kirk family. «Those failures not only robbed Charlie Kirk of his life, but also robbed his family of their husband, father, son, and brother, with impacts that will compound for the rest of their lives.»

The prospective plaintiffs in the filing are Kirk's widow, Erika Kirk, and their two juvenile children. It also acknowledges potential claims from his parents, Robert and Kathryn. The filing does not specify monetary damages. In addition to the wrongful death claim, it raises a claim of «state-created danger» under the U.S. Constitution.

Kirk built TPUSA into the country's largest conservative campus and youth-oriented activist organization. He spoke at the Republican National Conventions in 2016, 2020, and 2024 and had become a personal friend of the president as well as other prominent figures, including leading Utah politicians, the notice continues. As a result, he had detractors, faced death threats, and publicly spoke about that before his assassination. «You should not have to walk around with security for your entire family and for myself just because you support a politician or political candidate or certain values,» he said at an event in May 2025. «We get death threats,» he continued. «People want to murder us.»

Political violence was on the rise as Kirk geared up for TPUSA's 2025 campus speaking events, titled «The American Comeback Tour.» The filing references the numerous attempts on Trump's life, the home invasion hammer attack on California Rep. Nancy Pelosi's husband, Paul, and the murders of former Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark. «Tragically, the UVU Parties failed to rise to the occasion,» the filing alleges. «Through a series of stunning failures and reckless decisions, the UVU Parties created a foreseeable danger to Charlie.»

The allegations include a failure to perform a meaningful risk assessment or understand the significance of Kirk's visit to the UVU campus. Campus police allegedly did not have a written security plan or hold a security briefing in advance. The second was «walking [Kirk] into a fishbowl» — surrounded on all sides by tall buildings or other elevated positions. «The UVU Parties could have declined to approve the Tour event in the outdoor quad location, or could have moved the venue indoors or to a more secure location, as it had done for controversial speakers in the past,» according to the filing. The school also failed to dedicate additional resources for the outdoor venue despite the allegedly greater risk.

There were only six campus police officers assigned to the event, while Kirk's appearance attracted roughly 3,000 spectators, according to the filing. «On information and belief, [UVU Campus Police] Chief Jeffrey Long requested approval from then-UVU President Astrid Tuminez to allocate more than the six officers — which represented only 25% of the UVU police force — but his request was denied,» the filing continues. After the denial, campus police did not seek additional resources from neighboring departments, such as the Orem or Provo police departments, according to the filing.

Same event, other desks

Story file →